Any peace agreement that deprives the United States of a robust ability to fight terrorism in Afghanistan is not a peace agreement, but paves the way for a new attack on the U.S.-born country and attacks on U.S. interests around the world. Therefore, when military force is used, it is called „international armed conflict“ instead of „war.“ The fact that current international law avoids the use of the concept of „war“ also avoids the conclusion of a peace treaty based on the existence of war.  After the end of the war in Iraq in 2003, no peace treaty was signed and only UN Security Council Resolution 1483, adopted on 22 May 2003, established the post-war regime for the stability and security of Iraq.  It is important to focus on strategies for power-sharing, election observation and nation-building in order to achieve a full understanding of the structuring of peace agreements after civil war. While each issue may seem small in itself, the success or failure of a particular national peace agreement generally relates to the success of these provisions. In many cases, when political or economic resources are limited, political entrepreneurs will activate latent cultural or religious identities to build power bases capable of acquiring and controlling these resources. Unfortunately, these cultural roots are often used to commit atrocious crimes during a war; Crimes that only help to anchor and immortalize these identities. Whether these identities are real or perceived, they are valued in intense and long-term conflicts. One of the most difficult tasks in structuring peace agreements is therefore to enable reconciliation in order to build trust and restore „normal“ relations between the warring factions. While the categorization of any document negotiated during a peace process is often difficult, the following common classifications used by the United Nations to distinguish the different types of peace agreements are: Implementation mechanisms could include a United Nations peacekeeping mission or regional peacekeeping operations. These committees may include monitoring committees, chaired by the United Nations or by a neutral third party, including parties to the conflict and other relevant actors who must contribute to peace-building. The 1973 Paris Peace Accords, which s meant ending the Vietnam War, is yet another example of a peace treaty.
Probably the first recorded peace treaty, although rarely mentioned or memorable, between the Hethian Empire and the Hayasa-Azzi Confederacy around 1350 BC. More famously, one of the first recorded peace agreements between the hemetic and Egyptian empires was concluded after the Battle of Kadesh in 1274 BC (see Egyptian-Russian Peace Treaty). The battle took place in Syria today, the whole Levant was then taking place between the two empires. After an extremely costly four-day battle, in which neither side gained a substantial advantage, both sides claimed victory. The lack of solution led to further conflicts between Egypt and the Hethians, Ramesses II conquering the city of Kadesh and Amurru in its eighth year of rule.  The prospect of another long-running conflict between the two states finally convinced their two leaders, Hatusili-III. Ramesses to end their dispute and sign a peace treaty. Neither side could afford the possibility of a longer conflict, as they were threatened by other enemies: Egypt was placed under the responsibility of defending its long western border with Libya against the invasion of Libyan tribes by building a chain of fortresses, from Mersa Matruh to Rakotis, and the Hethians faced a more powerful threat in the form of the Assyrian empire that had conquered the „Hanigalbat, the mitanni nucleus, between the Tigris and the Euphrates“, which was previously a state of hethit vase.  Organizational/institutional components are agreements/mechanisms to encourage peace-building efforts under the agreement.