For neighbors who do not want to move or for whom this is really not feasible, another way is to solve the problem potentially, the offer to pay for use. This can be done by the invading neighbour who pays an annual fee to use the land, or even buys the small strip of land on which the fence or structure enters. Neighbours who are willing to discuss things can usually get a concession that they both appreciate. As a general rule, the owner of the invasive structure undertakes to keep them and to keep the neighbour unscathed for the damage that the intervention could cause. He remains responsible for the maintenance of the invasive structure. These agreements often provide that if the improvement is to be deteriorated and replaced, the future structure should not intervene. It is often true that interventions exist and neighbors know that they, until the time of a sale. Real estate investigations generated by the unpaid sale of a parcel can identify a previously unknown intervention or confirm the presence of a package. With the advent of more sophisticated survey facilities, intervention problems have become more frequent.
When a survey returns that shows an intervention, ask: Structural interventions occur when a landowner specifically builds something on land he does not own. This is usually between neighbors, but it could also be between the landowner and a municipality, because streets and sidewalks are often the property of the city for public use. Many interventions focus on the value of the land used, the fact that it does not belong to the user or the potential liability. By working with a third party and solving the problem through mediation, neighbours have the opportunity to resolve their differences, resolve the problem of aggression and move forward without animosity. Not all intervention agreements are equal. Many of them contain similar terms. For example, many intervention agreements contain variations of the following terms: The term intervention refers to a situation in real estate in which a landowner violates his neighbour`s property rights by building or extending a structure, intentionally or in some other way, on the neighbour`s land or land. Interventions are often a problem along controversial property lines where a person deliberately violates their neighbour`s borders or when a landowner does not know his or her limits. But a license is completely revoked. If the lessor subsequently decides not to authorize the intervention, the lessor can terminate the licence and require that the intervention be withdrawn.